Gidday,
I was wondering after I wrote the last blog about LL Bean refusing 3rd party requests from stopthejunkmail.com how clean the data is from catalog choice going to LL Bean, especially after I read this interview with Chuck teller the Executive director of Catalogchoice.org by Alan Rimm-Kaufman.
There is a question for Chuck as follows from Alan:
“Alan: So you are running list hygiene against your list? By opting out at my old address, I might have opted out at my new address?”
Chcuck’s response:
“Chuck: Let me be clear. We don’t have access to the NCOA list. We provide the name and address as you enter it in to the merchants and the merchant. To the degree that the merchant takes your name and address and run it through NCOA and find that you’ve moved, then they can make that request.”
All be it that this response is based around the change of address, if I read this correctly, it seems that catalogchoice.org is sending data to the cataloger and relying on the cataloger to clean their data and validate it.
I wonder how many opt outs sent from catalogchoice.org actually end up getting processed? Does catalogchoice.org then receive a file back from the cataloger telling them which opt outs were honored? How do they know?
Furthermore, catalogchoice.org does not require a credit card to validate the member signing up so someone could sign up with a name of Mr. a b c at some bogus address.
I fail to see why LL Bean (and other merchants) is using catalogchoice.org as a preferred 3rd party for opt outs when there is no validation of data. What process is catalogchoice.org using to validate their members authenticity?
Cheerio,
Margot











A continuous thread in waste mail discussions is asking if the mailer is using consistent list hygiene. Another salient, but rarely discussed point is the fact that commercial list hygiene, even if used every week only locates 60% of the actual movers. Since 70% of the “junk mail” problem is caused by moved no forward address, by statistical definition commercial hygiene processes, even when used diligently are not capabable of taking the 4% undeliverable & wasteful mail out of the mail stream. I elaborate on this topic in greater detail at blog.cognitivedata.net.
Rod